Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Robin Bertrand Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Bertrand analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Robin Bertrand Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 45.99% of points on his second serve, while Bertrand has won 51.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bertrand has won 55.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.61% and 37.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bertrand has saved 53.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Bertrand winning 64.58% (W/L 62/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Bertrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 144/ 77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 13/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Bertrand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.67% of matches (W/L 57/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.72 while Bertrand has played against players with an average rank of 228.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bertrand has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 41.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bertrand has converted 44.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 0 - 0 Bertrand
417
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
377
Rank
377
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
56% (401-312)
Career Total W/L
61% (176-112)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
71% (27-11)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Robin Bertrand |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 71% (27/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (19/29) | 67% (58/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (194/239) | 56% (435/347) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 80% (24/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 38% (3/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 100 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:22 | 1:53:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.45 | 260.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (748/1300) | 66% (1631/2482) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (527/748) | 66% (1080/1631) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (257/552) | 53% (454/851) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (37/93) | 43% (138/318) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (452/1257) | 44% (1147/2608) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 76% (26/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 70% (26/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 88% (24/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 13% (24/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 36% (14/5) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Robin Bertrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Saba Purtseladze
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
6
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
37 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Robin Bertrand
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Filip Peliwo
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Robin Bertrand
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Emile Hudd
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Max Wiskandt
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Moerani Bouzige
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Alexander Donski
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Bertrand Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Robin Bertrand
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
